School house mistress sexually abused boys, NSW Dictrict Court told | News.com.au
On Tuesday, a psychiatrist called by the defence opined the woman had a bipolar disorder and lacked control over her impulses at the time.
But Prof Greenberg disagreed, concluding she had a "personality disorder with mixed features", but did not have a severe mental illness which provided a defect of reason.
He said she had paedophilic tendencies but "technically" could not be classed as a paedophile because the behaviour occurred over five months, not the required six months.
Technically could not be classed as paedophile because the behavior occurred over 5 months not the required 6 months?
Is this for real the bahavior needs to occur for 6 months to be classed as paedophile.
As soon anyone performs any sex act with a child should be classed a paedophile.
No comments:
Post a Comment